How can sites like Binverse get away with charging for pirated media?
| Posted in Hot design topics, Latest News, Latest Post | Posted on 04-09-2009
7

I’m going to start off by saying downloading torrent files is 100% free, you can get literally any kind of digital file for free. So why are some web-sites charging for these free files? I think Peer 2 peer sharing should not be against the law, as it is your choice to share something you legally purchased. For instance you wouldn’t go to jail for lending your friend Michael your new Black Eyed Pea’s CD. So why should someone be fined hundreds of thousands of dollars for sharing their electronic files with peers over a network? If sharing files with thy neighbor is illegal than so should the public library system, you can borrow all kinds CD’s, DVD’s and VHS’s all for free.
Who’s to say people are taking them home and copying them? The RIAA shouldn’t be penalizing people who are innocently swapping files. For example if a group of people met up through meetup.com and decided to swap CD’s on a monthly basis no one would question or penalize them for doing so. Swapping live files or hard files no matter how you mix the medium it’s the same damn thing. Its not stealing, no one is profiting off of sharing their own files, nor are they profiting from downloading someone else’s shared files. The problem lies in how those files are being used, in my neighborhood you can find reformed drug dealers “so they say” Pushing all kinds of copyrighted material on the side of the road, and they are selling what is supposed to be free shared material and making profits up to 10,000 a month. They have no license to sell this material and do not claim any of this money on their taxes.
This is an outrage, the sheriff’s office allows these offenders to continue operating illegally; without even as much as a fine for solicitation of pirated goods on county property. What really disgust me, is that these individuals pay no taxes, rent, or fees to operate such an illegal business, and to add insult to injury the tax payers are footing the bill for their welfare/housing section-8. Cops don’t care about some kid selling pirated software on the side of the road. Why doesn’t anyone care about this? Why aren’t these individuals being prosecuted, for tax invasion, welfare fraud, operating without a business license, trespassing on public property, selling pirated media, just to name a few of the long list off offenses by these individuals. This is ridiculous! Numerous individual have been executed in court over sharing files they purchased legally, being fined ludicrous amounts in ranges of 25,00 all the way in the range of millions. Yet a person making 100,000’s of dollars a year in the peddling of pirated software can sell all he wants without even the slightest amount of punishment.
My other tiff is with Websites like UseNext and Binverse, Who do they think they are charging for torrents that they got from another torrent site for free? Why isn’t the RIAA shutting these sites down? Instead the RIAA would rather sink their teeth into legitimate sites who host file sharing but make no profit in doing so, meaning you don’t have to pay to download torrent files like you do on Usenext and Binverse. There are several sites gathering free torrents and then turning around and selling them for profit. These people my friend are the real criminals, these are the people who need to be fined and serve a lengthy sentence in jail. If you have a membership with a site that charges to download torrent files, not only are you stupid, your being ripped off and you’re supporting criminals. If people just shared and didn’t try and make a profit off of others stupidity, “the ones who don’t know about free torrent downloads” than I think that we could fight laws that permit us from sharing or swapping our own files.
I don’t think anyone has a right to tell me whether or not I can loan out a CD to my friend as well as if I decided to loan it to a few hundred friends over the internet. It is not stealing and it’s not wrong. The next time you lend anything out even a freaking pen, ask yourself this, should you have to call the manufacturer and get permission to loan something you paid for? What’s next serial codes on pens, paper, and books. Could you imagine a world in which you did not have the right to use freely anything you paid for? I think I made my point.
Article: How can sites like Binverse get away with charging for pirated media



[...] Its okay to share but to charge for a torrent that was originally free is BS Usenet is evil and should burn. Here is another article I found about Usenet http://99graphicdesigns.com/2009/09/how-can-peer-2-peer-sites-like-binverse-and-usenet-charge-for-sh... [...]
p2p is slow and newsgroups roar at all times/ you are not paying for the files/ you are paying for fast download speeds.
I never signed up for Binverse, I only pushed the free trial button. To get your “free” trial you have to pay $1 through PayPal. I canceled the transaction, but still Binverse somehow had everything they needed to start charging me for something I never signed up for.
Tried to call their “help”desk, but all I got was a sarcastic women who couldn’t help me at all. Had to take the dispute through PayPal instead, who immediately blocked Binverse for me.
My advice is to STAY AWAY FROM BINVERSE as they only cheat you and have no interesset in helping you once you’re trapped.
i think the Djm is not fully understanding the article its really not about whether or not the site is P2P its about sites like Biniverse grabbing files off of P2P sites that charge nothing to share files, and then they turn around and sell those files. They say you are paying for access to the servers, but the bottom line is those files are being sold for a profit which i feel is wrong.
I agree with the author as well.
The article is not about biniverse being P2P the author is stating that people are downloading free files off of P2P “getting the files free” and than charging to access them through thier servers.
If it wasnt for P2P networks than biniverse wouldnt have anyfiles at all to take and store on thier servers, its not right for them to charge for something they took off another site such as piratebay for free.
Neither UseNeXT or Binverse charge for sharing torrent files; they both charge for access to usenet – which pre-dates the web and therefore Bit-torrent. I would clue up before you go posting drivel like this again.
UseNeXT != Usenet. UseNeXT merely provide (albeit rather crap) access to Usenet. Usenet is not p2p.
You didn’t make your point, you posted a load of lies and uninformed crap.